Sunday, October 17, 2004Housing market, economy, and interest ratesI've been thinking harder about investing in property for tax benefits & as a passive income stream. But some of the articles I've been reading have been awfully scary. http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2004/0404.wallace-wells.html The article reiterates risks outlined in one of Greenspan's statements last year: Fannie and Freddie's market share was limited by their ability to attract investment capital. But in 1989, Congress instituted some modest-seeming technical changes that made Freddie and Fannie much more attractive to investors, and able to draw much more capital. Under the new rules, for instance, they were allowed to customize securities at different levels of risk and return to meet more precisely the demands of different sectors of the capital market. Then, too, bank regulators let pension funds and mutual funds class Fannie's debt as low-risk. As a consequence, during the 1990s, investors practically threw money at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which became enormously, steadily profitable. The GSEs used the new capital to buy up every mortgage they could, and banks were only too happy to sell off the mortgage paper. The price cap on the mortgages Fannie and Freddie could insure was raised. As a result of all these changes, Fannie and Freddie went from buying mostly mortgages for low-end homes to those of the middle- and upper-middle class. And the share of the nation's conventional mortgage debt which they insure has swelled, to more than 70 percent today, double its share in 1990. This shift has had two crucial, if under-appreciated, consequences. First, in little more than a decade, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have gone from handling one trillion dollars in mortgages to four trillion, with virtually no changes in oversight. Second, their dominance of the mortgage market has profoundly undermined the discipline that once kept housing prices in check. Once banks knew they could automatically hand off the mortgages they wrote to Fannie and Freddie with basically no risk, the old incentive system dissolved. "Banks and other mortgage lenders are not watching home prices carefully because they rarely hold onto the mortgage paper they create--they just sell it upstream to mortgage investors," John R. Talbott, a housing researcher at UCLA's Anderson School of Business, has argued. "It is a dangerous situation indeed when neither home buyers nor the institutions that finance them are concerned with the ultimate price being paid for the housing asset." http://boards.fool.com/Message.asp?mid=20594286&sort=whole#20595902 posted @ 10:49 AM PST [link] |
Here: Photos Archives Friends: wendylu duke spicysquid supremeboba dko magsyeh jen27g dtc rflxgrl ahlwoonie Literature: Memoirs of a Geisha Effective C++ Mastering RegEx Chess Music: Scientist Good Riddance Background I Fall in Love Too Easily |
